Skip to main content

Full text of "Idempotent Generated Endomorphisms of an Independence Algebra"

See other formats


Idempotent Generated Endomorphisms of an Independence 

Algebra 

Joao Araiijo 
February 1, 2011 

Abstract 

The aim of this note is to give a direct proof for the foUowing result proved by 
Fountain and Lewin: Let A be an independence algebra of finite rank and let a be 
a singular endomorphism of A. Then a — ei . . . Cn where ef = et and rank{a) — 
rank{ei). 

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 20M10. 

We assume the reader to have a basic knowledge of independence algebras. As ref- 
erence we suggest [3J. Throughout this note A will be an independence algebra of finite 
rank {rank{A) > 2) and with universe A. By End{A) and PEnd{A) we will denote, re- 
spectively, the monoid of endomorphisms and of partial endomorphisms of A, and Aut{Ai) 
will be the automorphism group of A. Moreover, End{A) \ Aut{A) is the monoid of sin- 
gular endomorphisms and will be denoted by Sing{A). For a € PEnd{A) and X C A, 
denote by A(a),V(a), respectively, the domain and the image of a, and denote by a\X 
the restriction of a to X. The following proof is inspired by |1] and goes as follows: 

(1) for every a € Sing{A) there exists an idempotent e G End{A) and a partial monomor- 

phism a' such that a = ea' (with V(e) = {E) = Aa' and V(a') = (Ea), for some 
independent set E); 

(2) there exist idempotents ei,...,e„ G PEnd{A) such that rank{ei) = rank{a) and 

{E)ei ... en = Ea; 

(3) for every / E Sym{Ea) (the symmetric group on Ea), there exist idempotents 

/i) • • • ) /m € PEnd{A) such that rank{fi) = rank{a) and / = (/i . . . fm)\Ea] 

(4) finally, using (2), a'\E : E Ea can be factorized as a'\E = {ei . . .enf)\E, with 

/ G Sym{Ea), and hence, by (3), we have a'\E = (ei . . . Cnfi ■ ■ ■ fm)\E, so that 
a = ea = ea' = eei . . . e^/i ■ ■ ■ fm- 

We start by proving (1). Let a G Sing{A). Since End{A) is regular there exists an 
idempotent e G End{A) such that ea = a (and rank{e) = rank{a)). Moreover, if is a 
basis for V(e), we have 

\Ea\ < \E\ = rank{e) = rank{a) = rank{ea) = rank{{E)a) = rank{{Ea)) < \Ea\. 



Therefore rank{{Ea)) = \Ea\ and hence Ea is independent. Since \E\ = \Ea\ and Ea is 
independent, then a\E is 1 — 1 and a\{E) is a monomorphism. It is proved that a = e{a\{E)) 
and (1) of the scheme above follows. 

For the remains of this note a, e, E and Ea are the objects introduced above and are 
fixed. We now prove (2). Let / = rank{a) and let Ki = {B C A \ \B\ = I and B is independent}. 
Consider in Ki the following relation: B2) € p if and only if \Bi \ -B2I ^ 1- 

Lemma 1 For some natural number n > we have {E, Ea) E p" . 

Proof: Let ^E = {C e Ki \ {E, C) e p"", for some natural m}. Now let C e^E such that 
for all D G"[E we have |Cni?a| > \Dr]Ea\. We claim that C = Ea. In fact, if by contradic- 
tion C 7^ Ea, then there exists d € C\Ea (as \C\ = \Ea\). Therefore, for some c G Ea, we 
have c ^ (C\{d}) (since we cannot have Ea C (C\{d}) as rank{{C\{d})) < rank{{Ea))). 
Thus Co = (C \ {d}) U {c} G Ki and (C,Co) € p. Since {E,C) G and (C,Co) G p it 
follows that (£■, Co) G p^+^ so that Cq £.^E and |Co n£^a| > \Cr\Ea\, a contradiction. It 
is proved that C = E'a and hence Ea Gt^. ■ 

We observe that the key fact used in the proof of this lemma is a well known property 
of matroids (see [Ij, Exercise 1., p. 15). 

Now let E = E1PE2P ■ ■ ■ pEn-ipEn = Ea. We claim that, for every z = 1, . . . , n — 1, 
there exist two idempotents ej.i,ei^2 G PEnd{A) such that (-Ej)ej_iej_2 = -^i+i. In fact let 
D = EiH Ei+i so that Ei = D U {x} and Ei^i = DU {y}. Then either y ^ {D U {x}) or 
y G {DU{x}). 

In the first case, D' = D Li {x, y} is independent. Thus we can define a mapping 
f : D' D L) {y} hy xf = yf = y and df = d, for all d D. This mapping / 
induces a partial idempotent endomorphism Cj^i : {D') —^{DU {y}) such that {Eijen = 
{D U {x})ei,i = DU{y} = Ei+i. (Let 6^,2 = ei,i). 

In the second case, rank[{D U {a;, y})) = rank{{D U {x})) < ranA;(^) and hence there 
exists z ^ {DU{x,y}). Therefore D[j{x,z} and DU{y,z} are independent sets and hence 
there exist two idempotents ei_i,ei^2 G PEnd{A) such that ei^i\D = ido = e.i^2\D, xei^i = 
zei^i = z and zei^2 = y^i,2 = V- It is obvious that (L> U {a;})ej^iej^2 = -D U {y} and hence 
{Ei)ei^iei^2 = -E'i+i- We have constructed idempotents ei^i, ei^2, ■ ■ ■ , en,i, en,2 ^ PEnd{A) 
such that (-E)ei^iei^2 • • • en-i,ien-i,2 = and hence (2) is proved. 

Observation 2 Observe that in both cases considered above, and for all i = \, . . . ,n — \, 

we have V(ei,i) < A(ej,2) and V(ei,iej,2) < A(ei+i,i). 

Lemma 3 Let Sym{Ea) be the symmetric group on Ea and let (xy) G Sym{Ea) be a 
transposition. Then there exist idempotents fi, f2, /s G PEnd{A) such that f = {fif2f3)\Ea 
and rank(fi) = rank(a). 

Proof: Since \Ea\ < rank{A) there exists z ^ {Ea) and hence Ea U {z} is independent. 
Let /i, /2, /s be idempotents of domain {Ea U {z}) defined as follows: xfi = z = zfi and 
ufi = u, for the remaining elements of Ea; x/2 = x = y/2 and u/2 = u, for the remaining 
elements of Ea; zf^ = y = yfs and ufi = u, for the remaining elements of Ea. Hence 
{x)fif2h = {z)f2h = {z)h = y and {y)fif2h = {y)f2h = {x)h = x. Moreover, for all 
h G Ea \ {x,y}, (6)71/2/3 = b. It is proved that {fif2f3)\Ea = (xy) and it is clear that 
rank{fi) = rank{a). ■ 



2 



Lemma 4 Let f S Sym{Ea). Then there exist idempotents /i, • • • ,/m G PEnd{A) such 
that / = (/i . . . fm)\Ea and rank{fi) = rank{a). 

Proof: Clearly {Ea)f = {Ea){xiyi) . . . {xmUm), since every permutation of a finite set 
can be decomposed in to a product of transpositions. Now the result follows by repeated 
application of the previous lemma. ■ 

Observation 5 Observe that, for all the partial idempotents fi considered in the proof 
of the two previous lemmas, we have ^{fi) = {Ea U {z}) and V(/i) = {Ea). Thus 
V(/,) < V(/i+i). 

Lemma 6 Let io,ii G PEnd{A) and suppose that V(io) < Then there exist 

/3o,/3i € End{A) such that (/3o/3i)| A(io) = ioii, rank{j3j) = rank{ej) and if ij is idempo- 
tent, then /3j is idempotent (j £ {0, 1} ). 

Proof: Let io : (Bq) — > (Cq) be a partial endomorphism {Bq,Co are independent sets). 
Then we can extend Bq,Cq, respectively, to B,C, bases of A and define f^Q : A ^ A 
such that /3o|-Bo = io and {B \ Bq)I3q = {c} C Cq. In the same way we extend ii to 
/?i S End{A). Therefore /3o|A(io) = io and V(/3o) = V(io)- Thus (/3oii)|A(io) = ioii and 
(/3o/3i)|A(io) =ioii. ■ 

Theorem 7 (Fountain and Lewin J^) Every a £ Sing{A) is the product of idempotents 
ei, . . . , e„ G End{A) such that rank{a) = rank{ei). 

Proof: Let a G Sing{A). Then there exists an idempotent e (with V(e) = {E)) and 
a partial monomorphism a' = a\{E) such that a = ea' . Moreover a' maps the basis 
E of V(e) into a basis Ea of V(a). We proved that for some idempotents ei, . . . ,6^ G 
PEnd{A) we have {E)ei . . . = Ea. Let h = ei . . .e^ and consider / G Sym{Ea) 
defined by {xh)f = xa, for all x £ E. It is obvious that {ei...ekf)\E = a\E and 
hence (ei . . . ek4>)\{E) = a\{E) = a', where (/> G Aut{{Ea)) is (the automorphism) induced 
by /. Therefore eei...ek4> = ^o! = a. It is also proved that for some idempotents 
/i, • • • , /n G PEnd{A) we have / = (/i . . . f„)\Ea. Thus (/> = (/i . . . /„)|(^a) and hence 

a = ea' = eei . . . efc(/> = eei . . . efc(/i . . . fn)\{Ea) = eei . . . Cfe/i . . . /„ 

(since V(eei . . . Ck) = {Ea)). To finish the proof we only need to show that the idempotent 
partial endomorphisms used above can be replaced by idempotent total endomorphisms. 
This follows from Observations [2] and [5] and the previous lemma. ■ 

Acknowledgments: I wish to express my deepest gratitude to the referee for suggesting 
many improvements to this note and also to Professor Gracinda Gomes. 

References 

[1] J. Araiijo, On Idempotent Generated Semigroups, Semigroup Forum, 65 (2002), 138- 
140. 



3 



[2] J. Fountain, A. Lewin, Products of idempotent endomorphisms of an independence 
algebra of finite rank, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 35 (1992), 493-500. 

[3] V. A. R. Gould, Independence algebras, Algebra Universalis 33 (1995), 327-329. 

[4] J. G. Oxley, Matroid Theory, Oxford University Press, (1992). 



Universidade Aberta 

R. Escola Politecnica, 147 

1269-001 Lisboa Portugal 



Centro de Algebra 

Universidade de Lisboa 
1649-003 Lisboa Portugal 
mjoao@lmc.fc.ul.pt 



4